# assessment

## Hero

### Technical clarity in

For teams that know something is off and want a clear read before committing to the wrong fix.

## When the right next step isn't obvious

A system feels fragile. Delivery is slower than it should be. A legacy surface keeps causing drag. A proposed fix sounds expensive, but nobody is fully sure it addresses the real problem.

You don't need vague advice. You need a clear diagnosis and a recommendation you can act on.

## Bleu Assessment

In 1-3 weeks, we:

- Understand the business and technical context
- Review the relevant code, architecture, and delivery shape
- Identify the actual sources of drag or risk
- Recommend the cleanest next step
- Outline a practical path forward, with or without Bleu

## Best fit if you...

- Know a technical problem is affecting delivery or stability
- Want an outside read before committing to a rebuild, migration, or new initiative
- Need clarity on whether to fix, re-scope, replace, or stop
- Prefer a direct recommendation over a long diagnostic exercise

## What typically comes next

Assessment is useful when the next move is still unclear. From there, the path is usually obvious:

- Assessment → Sprint: the problem is clear enough to take on as a bounded engagement
- Assessment → Squad: the work is ongoing and needs a stable team owning it over time
- Assessment → internal execution: you keep the work in-house and use the recommendation to move faster